<Anchor>

The controversy is a time-lapse regulation of the so-called anti-burn laws ahead of the National Assembly, or it is not an innovation industry.

Journalist Chung Sung-jin analyzed the background of this story.

<Reporter>

When the anti-tatha law passed the National Assembly, Lee Jae-woong, president of the tada parent company Soka, spoke out.

The prohibition of burning is an overseas topic that blocks the breathing hole of the innovation industry and is likened to the red flag law of the United Kingdom.

This law, enacted in 1865, is a representative anachronistic regulation that suppressed the automotive industry to protect the wagon industry.

Taxi groups criticized the ride as a pseudo call taxi that simulated innovation.

Parliamentary lawmaker Hong-Geun Park also protested that he is not an innovator and that other innovators support the amendment.

From the consumer's point of view, the biggest concern is whether or not the service will disappear when the law changes.

[Kim Dong-jeon / Seongdong-gu, Seoul: (Taxi's) The problem of refusing to ride was the worst, but it would be more annoying than discomfort.

While the current business model of hiring a driver for a car is not possible, you can continue your business if you buy a taxi license by paying a contribution.

However, it costs a lot to buy a taxi license.

So it's up to the decree to be made whether to survive or disappear.

Enforcement Decree contains how many taxi licenses you can buy and at what price.

[Kang, Kang, Hanyang University Professor of Transportation Logistics: How do we attract and implement mobility providers? There's a problem of contributions (which we'll discuss in the Decree), and there's a total amount of (taxi vehicle) going forward. .]

There is a view that the confrontation is a skirmish to put the contents of each other in the Decree.

(Image editing: Park Jin-hoon)