<Anchor>

However, there is also a claim that the supply of apartments will be reduced if the sale price cap is introduced. If the sale price is lowered, the profits from reconstruction or redevelopment will decrease so much that the company will not go ahead with the business at all.

Reporter Han Seung-gu wondered whether this was true or not.

<Reporter>

There was a time when the price limit was applied to private apartments. 2008 through 2013.

Prior to that time, an average of 400,000 households were licensed a year in the country, but during this period, supply was clearly reduced to just over half of the 2,300,000 households.

At first glance, the supply of capping makes sense. But at the time, there was another factor: the financial crisis.

Housing demand, investment capacity, and sentiment are all shrinking, and housing supplies are down, and some argue that this is because of caps.

At that time, the supply of homes has been restored since 2010 with the Bogeumjari housing policy.

From 2008 to 2013, when the ceiling was enforced, the price of houses in Seoul rose 5.31%, while the prices of apartments that had been capped fell by 1.32%.

The supply is the government's will, and the ceiling on the sale price has a certain effect on the stability of the apartment price.

The reconstruction apartment has a higher sale price for investment and speculation rather than real demand and has a high sale price in its root cause.

The rise led by the reconstruction complex is unacceptable, and will directly hit the reconstruction complex.

What is of interest now is how effective the government's plan to supply 1 million units nationwide by 2022 will be.

There are some opinions that the pre-sale cap will increase house prices in the long run, but we need to watch carefully if house prices can rise further due to strong lending regulations and the global economy and our economy.

(Video Editing: Kim Jun-hee)