<Anchor>

Japan is reviewing another retaliatory card following export control measures aimed at us. Yet Japan is repeatedly arguing that it is not in violation of the rules of the World Trade Organization, which emphasizes a fair trade order.

I do not know why, but I do not know why.

<Reporter>

Japan is constantly changing its words about export regulation and why.

At first, I acknowledged that it was a political reason that the trust was undermined, but when I changed Korea to violate sanctions against North Korea, it is now said that Korea is in danger of safety because of mismanagement of export control.

Security, security, and so on, it's a basic rule of international trade.

Tariffs, and trade in the United States, the United States, Japan and the United States.

In recent years, I have been talking about a system called "catch-all," which means catch, catch, come, and so on.

The principle is to manage the export as much as possible so that the materials that can be exchanged with weapons do not fall into dangerous hands. Korea will not be able to export the conventional weapons because it does not introduce this catch. So, I will go to the allegations.

Today (17th), our government refused to say that it is not true, and that our catchall system is more strict than Japan.

Even if we are friends, we are subject to export licenses if there is any doubt.

However, there is no such limitation in Japan, and it is said that the international evaluation is good enough that Korea is better than Japan.

A week later, we will discuss the issue at a meeting of all the WTO members, and it will be a win-win situation for us to base our view on the fact that the security is an unjust retaliation for political purposes.

▶ Strong government ... Criticism of 'aggression', criticism of 'Japanese edition Chosun · Central'
▶ Blue, 'international public opinion' total force ... Beauty "I will get involved" What does it mean?