● On a Wednesday afternoon

, a man is lying on the bed of the'Prosecution Civil War' . He wore a suit and glasses and a mask, and he wore a ringer on his right arm. If you chose one of the most talked-about photos in Korea last week, it was probably not.

This one photo was the same as the Hwaryong Peak of'Prosecutor Civil War' on Wednesday (29th). A little over 2 pm that day, suddenly, the Seoul Central Prosecutor's Office sent a text to reporters. During the seizure and search of the USIM card of the prosecutor Han Dong-hun, who was designated as a suspect in the Channel A case, the investigation revealed that the physical investigation of the prosecutor's office led to the investigation by the chief detective of the Seoul Central Prosecutor's Office, Jung Jin-woong. The prosecutor Han Dong-hun, who seemed to have waited, also reported that he had been assaulted during the seizure search. The text battle between the two sides continued until evening. The picture distributed around 7:00 p.m., when the main news of the broadcaster was imminent, is the bedside picture of chief prosecutor Jeong Jin-woong. TV, internet, and the next day almost all newspaper pages were decorated with the same pictures.

Let's postpone the question of whether the investigation team leader's self-directed assault or the attempted destruction of evidence by the inmates. The Seoul Metropolitan Prosecutor's Office of the investigative team had stepped back and said, "It was not an obstacle to public execution." Rather, there was a reaction of'shocking' over the collateral battle between the incumbent prosecutor and the chief prosecutor. In addition to the inside of the prosecution, citizens who were not even interested in what the prosecution attachment was and who Dong-Hoon Han was all responded to, saying,'It's nasty.' The reporter was also surprised. The prosecution has been criticized by public opinion for a scandalous scandal or formidable investigation, but has it ever been seen before the people?

● Manager and Dengue fever… "Shin Jeong-Hwan's Question 1 Lost"

It didn't take long for shock and surprise to turn into ridicule and criticism. Bedside photo release was the tipping point. As a ghost, a netizen found a celebrity Shin Jeong-hwan's'Dengue fever hospitalization picture' and made a'two shot'. The reason was that the composition and feel of the pictures were similar. (Professor Jin Joong-Kwon's Facebook post, which was quoted mainly by the media, is after the photos have spread quite a bit.) On SNS, Shin Jeong-Hwan commented that he had suffered a'one question in one'.


Of course, there is no reason to understand the background of the photo. The so-called'character battle' that continued throughout the afternoon flowed with the atmosphere that one prosecutor's office occupied a little over time. While one prosecutor gave relatively detailed explanations of the post-war situation and recorded video at the time of the fight, the investigative team was unable to respond. (Although this may not be the case) Even the speculation of whether or not he was a ill-informed doctor was admitted little by little. In the end, after several answers, "Please wait," is the entrance statement of the chief prosecutor Jeong Jin-woong and a picture of the problem.

However, the result was a'dengue fever parody'. Far from being reversed, public opinion became cooler. Prosecutor Han Dong-Hoon also responded that the Internet community, which was hostile toward the prosecutors' office, was arrogant about the photos released by prosecutors. It was an incredibly poor hand to be considered as the card from the Seoul Central District Prosecutor's Office, the prosecution that the brains of the Republic of Korea gathered. What message did the prosecution want to give to the public by revealing the photos?

●'Political act'

of photo disclosure The prosecution's bedside photo disclosure was closer to'political action' than'transmission of facts'. The act of pursuing different purposes by appealing to emotion through visual images rather than specific and accurate explanations. As explained by the chief prosecutor Jung, there are many possibilities and justifications for receiving medical treatment due to physical or mental shock in an unexpected unexpected situation during the seizure search process. However, to explain this situation, I had to release photos.

In fact, I saw a lot of this scene somewhere. A photo of a politician who claims to have suffered an injustice (or who claims to have been) lies on his bed and complains of suffering. Maybe it was the reason for shock and surprise that this happened at the prosecution, not the political version. There is a feeling of deception, "Why are you out there?" Perhaps someone who was a politician would have done something similar, so I'm not sure.

Obviously, the above things have played a part in the process by which Korean politics today lost public trust and become a caricature. Through unconsidered political acts that have not fully weighed in the sensitivity of public opinion. If it was learned by the prosecution at first, even if you didn't learn it, you learned it wrong. He said,'The prosecutor speaks in an investigation'.


● “The prosecution's story”… The damage was a

lot of talk and ridiculous investigations seen by the people . It is the case that the truth (or close) must be identified for the whole of our society, not for the restoration of trust of the prosecution and the media. But there is too much noise. The prosecution and another investigation were added just after the struggle. Suspicion leads to suspicion, and incidents to produce events.

It is undeniable that even today, even if prosecutors are criticized and accused of saying “the greatest crisis since liberation,” they still play a part in our judicial order. Unless the prosecution disappears, even after reform, the prosecution must continue to play an important role in maintaining social order. Even after dividing the role with the airborne or police, the prosecution must continue to catch the criminal and rescue the victim.

When such prosecutions become comical and ridiculous, in the end, the damage is bound to return to our society and the people. Who will succumb to the ridiculous prosecution? Prosecution reform is to disperse power, not to degrade authority. The social costs arising from the prosecution's lack of authority are shouldered by the state and society. It takes a long time and greater power to restore the once broken authority and trust. At the very least, the prosecution should not be self-defeating.