Police said they were "somewhat surprised" by the prosecution's decision to bribe his wife, Lee Hyeong-myeong,

In fact, it appears that the police are publicly dissatisfied with the prosecution's decision.

The South Korean police in the southern province said on November 11, "The decision of the prosecution is somewhat unexpected," the statement said.

Police said they had received the case from Suwon District Prosecutors' Office on April 12, followed by an investigation by Lee Jung-ryul, a lawyer, on June 11, in close consultation with the prosecution for seven months.

He added that he did his best to identify the truth by collecting and analyzing vast amounts of data through a warrant issued by a judge over 30 times.

Nevertheless, the prosecution decided to make a fire and put it in a somewhat unexpected position.

Meanwhile, the police conducted a wide range of investigations, including analyzing more than 40,000 articles in the 'Hye Kyung Palace' on twitter account, and concluded that 'Hye Kyung' Kim and Kim are the same person.

However, the prosecution decided to dispose of the fugitive on the basis of the fact that it is insufficient to conclude that the shareholder of 'Hye Gyeong Kim' twitter account is Mr. Kim,

It is based on the fact that the base screen estimated by the registration e-mail of 'HyeKyunggung Kim' Twitter account has been broadcasted on the internet. I have heard that there is a limit to being recognized as evidence because the original shooting medium is not secured.