IFK Gothenburg's Giorgi Kharaishvili received no penalty when he overturned in the penalty area in a duel against Djurgården's Jacob Une Larsson. A moment later, the visitors got a corner after Mohamed Buya Turay was in the offside position. In the sequence afterwards, the Stockholmers set the only goal of the match.
- I have nothing to add there. Everyone can say that it is wrong, there is nothing to add there. It is clear that he is doing so badly. I myself know what it is like in that situation. You do not sleep, barely eat and eat it around and around. But what to do? You can't lie down and die, judge Stefan Stefanesson tells SVT Sport.
The referees have had the discussion about VAR, the video tool video assistant referee, to go full-time again. Johannesson himself does not hesitate if the judges want to introduce VAR.
- Of course we want it. If you ask the judge, we want it tomorrow. We have always wanted to do that. Then these situations had been rectified. But VAR is not God's holy judgment either. There won't be a hundred percent there either, but there is a much higher chance that it will be right.
Last night, Sef's (interest organization for clubs in Allsvenskan and superettet) general secretary Mats Enquist tweeted the question: Many feelings, many opinions ... How should we do in Allsvenskan? Should accuracy be increased with VAR, or should we keep the game as it is - with the understanding that human error happens?
The vote was answered by 5362 people. 54 percent think that VAR should not be introduced while the rest is positive to it.
When SVT Sport reaches Enquist on Tuesday, he develops his thoughts on the issue that is currently the hottest potato in Swedish football.
- It's pretty even what you think, I can say. Although it was a little extra polarized yesterday maybe. This issue splits the football in my middle.
How do you think about Sef around where?
- The union is conducting an investigation where we are involved. They are just looking at the VAR issue. What it is for technology, what it costs, what is it for application, if it works and so on. We have no definite idea yet, except that when it becomes so polarized you have to make a choice. The judges are very exposed in this situation. How do we support the judiciary and at what level do we support? It does not have to be WHERE, you may need to introduce other support. This discussion will last all winter, no doubt, says Enquist and continues:
- For us, the question is not just technology or technology. For us, the issue is to create a higher quality and a more acceptable situation with all stakeholders to work from. As it is right now, it's not fun for any party. There will be frustration on the part of the clubs, the judges and the supporters. This VAR concept is hugely multifaceted. It's not just about technology. Also how they are applied. Target camera is a type of VAR that could be acquired. Then there are techniques where the judges hardly have time on the pitch for them to run out and watch TV screens all the time.
However, Enquist does not think anything will happen in the near future.
- Reasonable as it looks now, I think that regardless of road choices, you will learn to use this winter and 2020 to decide what you want to do. Do you want a guess from me, I think nothing will happen before 2021, if there is even a change now.