An engineer embezzles 21,000 dirhams from a consulting firm

A partial civil court in the courts of Ras Al Khaimah has ordered an engineer, working in an engineering consulting firm, to pay the plaintiff company 22,500 dirhams, as he had embezzled 21,000 dirhams for the purpose of harming the company, and the Public Prosecution in Ras Al Khaimah charged the defendant with 21,000 embezzlement charges Dirhams owned by the plaintiff with the purpose of harming her.

The defendant denied in the investigations that he had misappropriated the amount, and stated that he had received it and placed it in the company’s safes in a special drawer, without knowing where the amount had disappeared.

The misdemeanor court had ruled to fine the accused 3000 dirhams, obligating him to pay the fees owed, and referring the civil case to the competent civil court, where the accused appealed the judgment before the Misdemeanor Appeal Court, which decided to accept the appeal formally, and in the matter of rejecting it and confirming the appealed judgment, and the judgment was not accepted. With the appellant, he appealed against him with a cassation, which ruled to accept the appeal in form, and in the matter to reject it, as the judgment became final and final.

A partial civil court affirmed in the merits of its ruling that the court established that the defendant’s actions, contrary to the provisions of Sharia, had been committed with his knowledge and with his free will and choice, and he had incurred material losses to the plaintiff and had inflicted material damage on her.

She added that the judgment of the Court of Cassation has become final to reject the appeal against it, and it has been severed with a necessary chapter, and she pointed out that the defendant bears responsibility for reparation for all the damages resulting from his mistake, and then the elements of responsibility have been available against the defendant, and the court obliges him to pay 21 thousand dirhams Regarding the criminal case, and with regard to the material damage, the plaintiff has suffered real damage as a result of the defendant’s act of embezzlement of her money, and the damage that has befallen her represented in her being deprived of her money, and with it the court assesses the material damage at a value of 1000 dirhams, and obliges the defendant to pay it, and on the moral harm it decided The court is to oblige the defendant to pay the plaintiff 500 dirhams as compensation for moral damage, as it harms the company from its position in front of clients and breaches its reputation.

Follow our latest local and sports news, and the latest political and economic developments via Google news