The seizures contained heroin

The Federal Supreme Council supports penalizing a drug dealer with life and deportation

The Federal Supreme Court upheld a ruling of the first instance court and the Court of Appeal, which ruled for life imprisonment and deportation from the state for a person accused of possessing the narcotic heroin substance for trafficking in it, confirming that assessing the seriousness of the investigations and their adequacy to issue the authorization for inspection are matters that belong to the investigation authority under the supervision of the court, and that the request to hear witnesses Not binding on the court, as long as it finds enough in the lawsuit papers to form its doctrine.

In the details, the Public Prosecution referred the accused to criminal trial and assigned him the possession of narcotic "heroin" for the purpose of trafficking. The competent Abu Dhabi Court of First Instance in attendance ruled in his presence for life imprisonment, deportation from the state after the execution of the sentence, and forcing him to pay the due fee, so the judgment was appealed, and the Court of Appeal decided to uphold The verdict and obligated the accused to draw.

The accused appealed the judgment by way of cassation, and confirmed the invalidity of arrest and inspection due to the lack of seriousness of the investigations, indicating that the permission to arrest and search was issued in the name of another person, and that his name was known after his arrest, and that the verdict ruled his conviction despite the lack of evidence of his possession with the intention of promotion, and that the weight of the seizures It differs from the weight of what was analyzed in the laboratory, which means that the accusation is not fixed due to the differences, and the accused insisted on calling a witness to question and discuss him.

For its part, the Federal Supreme Court confirmed that the verdict inferred that the crime against the accused has been proven from the seizure incident and the report of the General Administration for Drug Control, and the testimony of a witness in the Public Prosecution Office of the receipt of confidential information stating that the accused possesses a quantity of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances with the intent to trade, and is in the process of selling A quantity of it from one of the secret sources, at a value of 260 thousand dirhams, and that it was seized after preparing an ambush to hand over the agent in the role of the buyer of narcotic substances, and the appellant received the sum of the money as the price of the goods agreed upon.

It indicated that the accused confessed in the report of inference and the investigations of the Public Prosecution Office that he handed over a person a bag containing narcotic substances, and that he received a sum of money from him, and that he knows that the content of the bag is narcotic substances, pointing out that the report of the Forensic Medicine Department of the Chemical Laboratory Department, after examining the seizures, proved that it contained a substance Narcotic heroin.

Follow our latest local and sports news, and the latest political and economic developments via Google news