He requested moral compensation and the court refused

A man is innocent of beating two children in the building's swimming pool

The Court of Appeal in Abu Dhabi ruled to uphold the judgment of the Court of First Instance, which ruled to reject a request to compensate a man and his wife for the material and moral damages they suffered, after accusing the husband of beating two children of determination inside a building swimming pool, and the court confirmed that there is no evidence of the husband's claim that my mother The two children intended from the accusation to extort his money, and the court ruled rejecting the appeal.

The details of the case refer to the accusation of two mothers of two children with autism, their neighbor of beating each of them in the swimming pool of the building, and he was referred to the prosecution office, and he obtained a final judgment and became innocent, which resulted in the neighbor and his wife filing a lawsuit for compensation for the material, moral and moral damages, and the loss they suffered. And what they missed from gaining from what happened to them as a result of this accusation.

The appellant (the neighbor) indicated that his accusation of assaulting the two children resulted in his arrest for a period of three days, his sponsorship of 5,000 dirhams, and his ban on travel for a period of seven months during the handling of the case, and his reputation and dignity were subjected to defamation, insult, and injury to his dignity, which afflicted him with anguish, heartache, despair and frustration, besides his suffering In exchange for attorney fees in the case, his wife suffered a nervous breakdown, and she fainted and slept in a hospital, and her children were left without care.

He accused his two neighbors of arbitrarily using the right to complain, and that the intent was to bargain with him and exploit him to obtain his money and to enrich himself at his expense by exploiting the state of autism for the two children.

The Court of Appeal stated that the case papers lacked any evidence that the two neighbors lied about reporting the neighbor that he had beaten their two sons, or that they rushed to do so without deliberation or insight, and there is also no evidence for the appellant’s claim that the intention was to extort his money and enrich himself on his account, and that he had been judged innocent. As previously explained, it does not conclude anything of this, and it does not indicate more than that the court has questioned the incident attributed to him as mentioned in the records of its judgment. Judgment appealed, and obligated the appellants to pay expenses.

The

Follow our latest local and sports news, and the latest political and economic developments via Google news