In Ras al-Khaimah, the Personal Status Court began hearing a lawsuit filed by a (Arab) wife against her husband, to prove her divorce from him, after he divorced her by phone by three while talking to her mother's relative, during an attempt to reconcile them.
The wife explained, in the lawsuit newspaper, that her husband left the family home, where they were staying with her parents because of marital differences between them, pointing out that he was preparing a separate house for the wife, and left her without alimony, families or expenses to meet her needs of food, drink and clothing, although he is well off .
She pointed out that he assaulted her by beating and insulting her, abandoning her and leaving the house without a legal or legal reason, and threatening her to open criminal communications against her parents, and accused him of treason, which caused great harm to her.
She added that she tried to resolve the differences amicably and did not succeed, which led her to turn to the Committee for Guidance and Family Reform to resolve the dispute, and the committee was unable to reconcile between them and presented a certificate of incapacity, adding that her husband phoned her mother’s relative to resolve the dispute between them, last January, and during his talk he decided that his wife Divorced with three.
The lawsuit newspaper reported that her mother's relative asked the husband to confirm the divorce, so he decided that he would confirm this to her, and that she had reviewed it after three days during his visit to her home, and confirmed the divorce.
The lawsuit newspaper stated that the wife ended her legal count, and whether she was a reader or not, then her legal count ended without the husband returning her to his bond, whether by saying or indeed because he uttered divorce, which means that her period has passed, and the divorce has become lame, with a slight indication, adding that there is An audio recording of the husband during his conversation with her mother's relative confirms the divorce, and that the recording was made with his knowledge and with his consent and he did not object to it.
The wife asked the court to address the General Communications Authority to inquire about the incoming and outgoing calls from her husband's phone, to explain the content of the calls and verify his uttering of divorce, as she confronted him with his uttering of divorce, but he did not deny that it occurred but confirmed it, and also requested that the file of the Steering and Family Reform Committee be included in the case.
She pointed out that the husband divorced her without asking her and in her absence by phone, what is required for him to judge the wife to prove her divorce from her husband, and obligate him at the end of the dowry, and to pay her a housing expense of 15 thousand dirhams, and obligate him to pay her 60 thousand dirhams a fun expense of 5,000 Dirhams per month, and requiring him to marry alimony from the date of desertion of the marital bed until the issuance of the final judgment in the case, at 5,000 dirhams per month.
For his part, the husband demanded the rejection of the lawsuit filed by his wife, according to the text of Article No. 1 of the Evidence Law, claiming that the lawsuit lacked legal evidence in the evidence, and that the wife tried to change the facts, noting that he had rented the marital home and equipped it, and that her parents were staying With them at home.
He indicated, in the lawsuit newspaper, that he tried to return his wife within two months to continue marital life, but that his wife's family refused, based on some of the text messages and audio recordings he provided to the court.