A father was surprised that his son, whom he thought was the best of his upbringing and upbringing, was involved in participating with others in the murder of a young man, during a fight, using white weapons, fearing that he would be sentenced to death, wondering about his legal status in the case, especially as he says that his role was limited to Catching the victim without attacking him with a weapon.
First, legal counsel Dr. Yusef Al-Sharif warned of the danger of paralysis among young adolescents, which sometimes leads to delinquency, crimes, and participating in quarrels motivated by disciplining others, warning at the same time against excessive trust in children, especially in adolescence, and the absence of family control over the children's behavior .
He cautioned that some families see their children as angels, and the children of others are demons, wondering why our view is not objective or abstract of emotions about everything around us, and the first of our children.
He cited the words of some mothers, when she described her son that there is no wiser than him, and that he was looking from home to school, he does not know anything about the world, but it was the son of so and so who spoiled his morals, or his friends in school who taught him the deviant behavior.
Regarding the legal opinion on the son's situation in the case and its punishment according to the law, Al-Sharif stressed that killing the soul is one of the biggest sins, and it is the first crime committed on the face of the earth, so its severe consequence was whoever killed a person without a soul or corruption on the ground as if he killed all people, so this is The crime is subject to the provisions of Islamic Sharia and its penalties are retribution or pardon from parents of blood and parents, and that if there is no retribution for any reason, discretionary punishments are expected.
According to the questioner’s depiction of the incident, according to the words of his son to him, he and his friends, and following the words of the victim over his insulting daughters, went with some white weapons to discipline the victim, and that the questioner’s son beat him and caught him so that he would not flee.
He cautioned that the person’s talk about the girls and his insult to the friend of the daughter of the questioner in a non-meeting between them or a direct confrontation between them is not permissible to infringe upon him because the infringement is a defense of the soul or the offer if the infringement of the soul or the show is in the face of the person so the diet takes him and he encroaches into a legal defense.
As for non-confrontation, the person does not have the right to take possession of his own hand, but the law is the one that takes its course in these cases, otherwise the law of the jungle prevailed, and the boy went with his friends with the intention of disciplining the person with white weapons, and he beat him and grabbed him. That enabled the rest of the quarter to kill him, and thus your son’s charge of participating in the premeditated murder of the person, which is his punishment according to the provisions of Islamic Sharia and the provisions of Articles 331 to 333 of the Federal Penal Code.
He pointed out that the text of Article (331) stipulates that: Without prejudice to the right to legal compensation due legally, whoever commits one of the crimes stipulated in this chapter shall be punished with the penalties indicated therein, in cases where the punishment of retribution is not imposed.
Article 332 stipulates that whoever kills a soul deliberately is punished with life imprisonment, and the punishment is death if the killing took place with surveillance or preceded by determination, or is associated with or linked to another crime, 3- The penalty shall be imprisonment for a period of no less than seven years if the blood parents are pardoned On their right to retribution at any stage of the lawsuit or before completion of the implementation ».
Article 333 stipulated that “the previous insistence is the intention determined before the act to commit a crime against any person and to provide the means necessary for the accurate implementation of the act, and surveillance is the person’s stalking of a person in a party or many entities for a long or short period of time to reach the killing of that person or Assaulting him with an act of violence. ”
However, if the court finds out about the circumstances of the incident, the age of the child and the absence of criminal precedents, and school certificates can be used for example, proving his superiority or certificates of appreciation, whether from a work authority if he works, athletic excellence or excellence in any field that proves good conduct and behavior, the court can take him with a degree of clemency according to Articles 97, 98 and 99 of the Penal Code.