Six decades after his death, James Dean returns to a new film tournament

حسام فهمي Free Membership

Surprisingly, James Dean returns to the spotlight, even though he died in 1955 after a 24-year-old accident, in which the late star, through CGI, is taking part in a new war-time war movie. American in Vietnam.

James Dean was one of the most important American stars of the 1950s, where he embodied the role of inspiration for a new generation of young Americans, especially after starring in the movie "Rebel without cause" (1955).

His sudden departure then saved him an iconic place in the hearts and minds of the masses around the world.

The new film, "Finding Jack," is based on an American novel based on real events about a soldier befriending a dog during the US war on Vietnam, in line with a funny historical fact that the US military has left more than 1,000 trained dogs. Inside Vietnamese territory after he withdrew from it.

The announcement of the choice of the late James Dean through the directors of work, namely, Ernest and Tati Gulch, but this announcement angered and even angered many of the fans and stars of American cinema, who welcomed him as a disrespect for the legacy of the late American artist.

The first objection to this choice was the American actor Chris Evans, famous in the series of the movie "Avengers" in the role of "Captain America". Perhaps we would ask a computer to create a new Picasso or compose other music in the style of John Lennon.

American actress, singer and great writer Betty Midler tweeted on her official Twitter account that "James Dean was chosen to star in a new film through CGI". Even those who have died can still get a job. "

Many similar negative reactions prompted the filmmakers to declare that they did not deliberately choose James Dean but continued to think for many months in an attempt to find a suitable actor for the role, but in the end they found no way but to recall the image and voice of the late actor through the technique of "CGI".

Workers' attempts also continued to avoid the anger of James Dean's audience. They asserted that they had obtained all possible approvals from the late artist's family and that they would do their best to make the James Dean audience proud of the work.

The question then remains: can we call the late artists' use of modern technologies a sign of artistic bankruptcy, or even trafficking in the fame of the dead, or is this a continuation of the creative development of creating a new film and artistic medium? This is what the public will judge in the future.