Fifteen majority MPs have already announced that they would vote against the government's plan to regulate immigration to be discussed Thursday in the National Assembly. Among them, the deputy of Vaucluse Jean-François Césarini. And the elect does not mince words.

REACTION

The Prime Minister said that "all members of the government are comfortable with the plan to regain control of (our) migration policy," but this is not the case for all LREM MPs. In the left wing of the majority, the introduction of the three-month waiting period before being able to access Universal Health Protection (Puma) and a modification of the State Medical Aid (AME) creak teeth.

>> READ ALSO - Professional Immigration: What you need to know about the quota system wanted by the government

Fifteen MPs have already announced that they would vote against these measures, which will be discussed on Thursday in the National Assembly in the 2020 budget. Among them, the LREM deputy of the first constituency of Vaucluse Jean -Francois Cesarini.

"We had the report of Igas [General Inspectorate of Social Affairs, ed] on Tuesday, and more than 80% of people who have the right to the AME, do not ask," he notes at the microphone 1. "So to consider that it will take some care for a prior agreement of social security will have two consequences: to bring more people to emergencies - they do not need - and, perhaps , reduce the number of people still doing the necessary steps.We will go from 12 to 10%, it is savings of candlelight.It is a politician, electoralist, inefficient and a little clientelist.