Justice appointments in Sudan .. Head of the judiciary and the Attorney General in the Committee of thorns

Ahmed Fadl-Khartoum

A committee of thorns will be approached by the new head of the judiciary, Nemat Abdallah Mohamed Khair and Attorney General Taj al-Sir Ali al-Habr.

The two officials will face two difficult tests, one related to the demand to rebuild the justice system, and the other to the achievement of criminal justice in the massacre of the disengagement of the General Command of the army on June 3 and the perpetrators of crimes of the former regime.

The demands, along with the appointment of the chief justice and the attorney general, were at the center of the street protest movement after the formation of the interim government last September.

Until Thursday, a protester alone protested in front of the Justice Ministry in Khartoum after he burned a frame chanting slogans of retribution for the martyrs of breaking up the sit-in.

The Transitional Government's partners were forced to amend the constitutional document to avoid appointments to the two posts through the selection mechanism of the Supreme Judicial Council and the Higher Prosecution Council, where both houses are controlled by the regime of ousted President Omar al-Bashir.

Decontamination elimination
Lawyer for the Declaration of Freedom and Change, Hazrat Hazrat Hazrat, says that there are serious challenges awaiting both Nemat and Habib, because the talk now is not about reform or restoration, but about the process of rebuilding the transitional authority and the prosecution.

Hazrat asserts in an interview with Al Jazeera Net that the former regime demolished the justice agencies by fully politicizing them, and thus no standards of achieving justice, which became the joints of the ousted president and his regime, appoint whom he will and open malicious reports against opponents according to his whims.

He adds that there is a heavy legacy that requires reviewing the construction again and opening the files of all judges and prosecutors and review promotions, because all this was through political loyalty and the recommendation of the security apparatus, and increased "the competent remains and everything goes unfortunate."

Text of the document
Lawyer Saif al-Dawla praises God on his Facebook page, which cites revisions in particular, that the precise expression in the constitutional document stipulates that it is not a process of "reform", but "reconstruction" of the judicial organs "the judiciary and the prosecution."

Hamdallah proposes that the process of rebuilding the justice system be entrusted to a committee headed by the Chief Justice and the Attorney General, which includes jurists with specifications that take into account independence and impartiality. The committee also oversees the appointment of the Supreme Judicial Council and the Higher Prosecution Council.

He believes that the judiciary is an inverted pyramid built from top to bottom, and begins to form a Supreme Court with expertise and expertise, and then build the lower courts with qualified judges, stressing the importance of retaining judges and prosecutors professional.

Bashir trial
Al-Mu'ez Hazrat, who was among the lawyers led by the late Ali Mahmud Hassanein who filed a lawsuit against Bashir and the leaders of the June 1989 coup on charges of undermining the regime, predicted that the courts would be packed with new communications against former regime figures.

He said they would act to undermine the regime against Bashir, who is now on trial on charges not up to the crimes he committed, adding that the death penalty or life imprisonment was previously confronted with a hidden war, but with the courage of the ink will be moved.

Regarding the investigation of the sit-in, Hazrat asserts that it is the prerogative of the Council of Ministers, but in consultation with the Attorney General, a strong commission of inquiry can be formed because the 1954 law establishing the committee is weak.

He describes justice as the basic component of civil and the rule of law to respond to grievances and prosecute all those killed and corrupted, after the criminals dared to exercise their activity and appear in the media, as he put it.

Parliment
But the leader of the Popular Congress Party lawyer Kamal Omar Abdul Salam believes that the success of Nemat and Habr rush to speed up the formation of the Transitional Legislative Council to ease the pressure on the Chief Justice and the Attorney General in the reform of the imbalance of the justice system.

Abdul Salam says that from his knowledge of Nemat, she is able to restore the prestige and independence of the judiciary by amending the laws of civil and criminal procedures and laws, saying that she will find on her table the tragedies of interference in the judiciary.

Regarding the ink, the leader of the Popular Congress says that he is a lawyer and was a judge. He has experience that will enable him to achieve justice, thus ending the disruption of the prosecution of spoilers and killers in events such as Jabbar, Amri and Port Sudan through the incident of the sit-in.

Abdul Salam asserts that one of the most important priorities of Nemat and Habr is the elimination of distortions that have affected the judicial organs in the past 30 years, namely the courts, special prosecutors, judges and special prosecutors who enjoy privileges from institutions that challenge the independence of the justice agencies.