During debates on the bill on bioethics Wednesday, in the National Assembly, some deputies did not hesitate to call intimate memories to enlighten their position on the opening of the PMA to all women.

REPORTAGE

The bioethics bill arrived Tuesday at the National Assembly. And the deputies went into the thick of things on Wednesday with the first amendments on the opening of the PMA to all women. But rarely speaking in the Chamber will have been so personal.

Many elected officials have indeed chosen to discuss their life course to better support their positions. Thus Emilie Bonnivard, MP The Republicans, opposed the extension of the PMA to single mothers, did not hesitate to put forward his own celibacy. "Our role is much more than correcting the mistake that today, at age 40, a woman who wants to build her career and who is alone, finds herself in this impasse. years, alone, who speaks to you ... ", she said.

A framed course

In the debate, the issues of biological resemblance with his parents and the quest for origins emerge. A delicate question for the deputy Joachim Son-Forget, who speaks as adopted child. "Having grown up in Haute-Marne, with parents who looked good French, I can tell you that it's very different to not know your biological lineage and not look like your parents."

The first evening, at En Marche, MP Jacques Marilossian wanted to recall, by convening his own story, that the PMA, even extended to all women, remained a medical pathway and not a simple procedure. "My wife and I used the PMA, we were lucky, we had twins, but our medical journey lasted several years," he said.

The bill refers to the private sphere, which is why there is no voting instruction in any of the political groups. Coordonnées for Thursday, we have to look into the issue of the post -etsum ats, the women who have lost parking, want to have a project to have a child.