Two women from Asia, a 28-year-old visitor, used identity cards and medical insurance to treat her daughter, leukemia, as she returned to the daughter of the second defendant and illegally brought her to Dubai Hospital after she convinced the receptionist that she was " The mother of the cardholder who provided her, and provided her health care at a cost of more than 188 thousand dirhams, and attributed the accused behavior to the inability to provide treatment for her child, and the court decided to postpone the case to a hearing next.
The prosecution said that the second defendant was aware of all these details and presented her daughter's card to the first, so that she would cover the health care coverage of the insurance company.
The first mother came to the hospital accompanied by her daughter, who was suffering from high temperature, and was admitted to the emergency department, where she highlighted the identity card of another girl without being noticed by the receptionist, and after the examination of the girl found to have leukemia and need To a chemical treatment. She kept receiving doses for three months until the hospital management learned from the insurance company that the girl who was treating her was not the owner of the card. Accordingly, she was addressed to the Health Authority in Dubai.
She added that the two defendants were called by legal affairs to ask them how the identity and insurance card arrived at the first defendant's hand. The second mentioned that she had a friendship with the mother of the sick girl who came to the country with her daughter on a visit visa. And did not know that her friend copied the cards and used them in her health checkup at Dubai Hospital to treat her daughter until I was surprised that the credit limit for the treatment reached 188 thousand dirhams, saying that the girl who is treated is not On the basis of these confessions, the hospital administration amended the name of the patient so that there was no technical or medical error later.
According to a witness in the hospital's insurance department, on the basis of the registration of the sick girl in another name with an insurance card, the company undertook to manage the hospital to pay the payments due to the treatment of the sick girl until a call from a company employee told them that he had received a call from the second defendant Her daughter, and therefore the hospital asked the mother of the sick girl to show identity cards and health insurance at the last visit to treatment, and reported that it is not in possession.
Later, the second defendant came with her daughter and highlighted the documents proving that the girl who was treating her was not her daughter. The hospital administration decided to open the case.
The hospital discovered that the sick child was not the owner of the health insurance card .