The Supreme Court rejected the appeal of the owner of a seafood restaurant against a fine of 50,000 dirhams to be used as a non-guaranteed worker. The worker was sentenced to two months in prison and deported from the state for violating the laws of residency in the state.
In the details, the Public Prosecution referred the owner of a seafood restaurant to the trial. The first defendant (the worker), a foreigner who remained in the country illegally after the end of the residence granted to him after his condition was amended, refused to pay the prescribed fine and to work with his non-sponsor Without complying with the conditions and conditions prescribed for the transfer of the sponsorship, and in cases other than those authorized by law.
The owner of the restaurant was charged with using the first defendant to work for him, which is not his guarantee.
The Federal Court of First Instance punished the worker with a fine of 1,000 dirhams for the first charge, two months after the second charge and his expulsion from the state after the execution of the sentence. The second accused fined 50,000 dirhams for the charge and forced them to pay the court fees. The second defendant did not bow to this ruling and was opposed by the same court, which ordered him to amend the opposition ruling, and to re-acquit him of the charge against him. The Public Prosecution did not appeal to this court and appealed to him to appeal. The Court of Appeal canceled the first sentence and the sentence again punishes the accused restaurant owner by fining him 50,000 dirhams for his charge.
The prosecutor did not appeal to this court and challenged the appeal. The Public Prosecutor's Office submitted a memorandum demanding that he reject it. In turn, the Federal Supreme Court rejected this appeal.