A 28-year-old visitor who used two identity cards and medical insurance to treat her daughter suffering from leukemia returned to the daughter of the second defendant and brought her illegally to Dubai Hospital, After she convinced the receptionist that she was the mother of the cardholder she provided. She provided her health care at a cost of over AED 188,000. The defendant attributed her behavior to her inability to provide treatment for her child.
The prosecution said that the second defendant was aware of all the details and presented her daughter's card to the first, so that she would cover the health care coverage of the insurance company.
A witness, who works as an administrative officer, said that the first mother came to the hospital with her daughter, who was suffering from high temperature, and was admitted to the emergency department, where she highlighted the identity card of another girl, without being noticed by the receptionist. And needed chemotherapy, she continued to receive doses for three months until the hospital management learned from the insurance company that the girl who was treating her was not the cardholder. Accordingly, she was addressed to the Health Authority in Dubai.
She added that the two defendants were called by legal affairs to ask them how the identity and insurance card arrived at the first defendant. The second mentioned that she had a friendship with the mother of the sick girl who came to the country with her daughter on a visit visa. And did not know that her friend copied the two cards and used them in her health reviews at Dubai Hospital to treat her daughter, until I was surprised that the credit limit for the treatment reached 188 thousand dirhams, assuring that the girl who is not treated a Ntha, and based on these confessions, the hospital administration to amend the name of the patient, so there is a medical technician or an error later, and then embarked on legal affairs procedures open communication.
According to a witness in the hospital's insurance department, on the basis of the registration of the sick child in another name with an insurance card, the company undertook to manage the hospital to pay the payments due to the treatment of the sick girl until a call from a company employee told them that he had received a call from the second defendant Is not her daughter, and accordingly the hospital asked the mother of the sick girl to show her ID and health insurance at the last visit to the treatment, and reported that she was not in her possession.
Later, the second defendant came with her daughter and highlighted the documents proving that the child was not her daughter, and the hospital administration decided to open the case.