Britain's Prime Minister Teresa May announced to the House of Commons the postponement of the vote on the parliament, due to deep divisions among deputies who threatened to reject it, explaining that she had asked her government to speed up preparations in anticipation of exit from the European Union. Without agreement, something the economic community fears.

"We will postpone the scheduled vote Tuesday," she said, referring to MPs' opposition in particular to the solution to prevent the effective return of borders between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland, known as the "safety net."

She reiterated that the European Union would not agree to the BRICST agreement nor to a future relationship after London's departure on March 29 without this "safety net," which would establish a "unified customs zone", including the European Union and the United Kingdom, Any customs duties on industrial and agricultural goods. Northern Ireland would have a special status, as it would have limited rules for the single market.

Mai said she had heard the concerns expressed and was ready to discuss them with her European counterparts on the eve of the Brussels summit on Thursday and Friday.

Commenting on the postponement of the vote, House of Commons Speaker John Berko said the suspension of the discussion of the BRICCET agreement would be considered a maneuver, while Labor opposition leader Jeremy Corbin denounced an "unprecedented" situation and "a government living in total chaos."

In a related context, the highest court in the European Union, yesterday, that the British government can reverse the decision to leave the European Union without consulting the rest of the Member States. The European Court of Justice ruled in its urgent ruling yesterday that the United Kingdom had the freedom to unilaterally abandon the letter of intent in which it informed its intention to withdraw from the European Union without consulting the other members of the bloc. The verdict was in line with a view presented by a court legal adviser last week, bolstering the hopes of opponents of Britain's withdrawal to hold a new referendum that would block the country's planned exit from the bloc on March 29, 2019.

The court said that Britain should not face any sanctions if it stopped the exit process done by Article 50, after a referendum in June 2016 Britain, and the result was support for the withdrawal. "If the decision is reversed in line with the requirements of its constitution, it will mean that the UK remains in the EU under the same rules that will not change," the statement said.

"We have an agreement on the table and the bloc is ready for all the scenarios," a UNHCR spokeswoman told reporters in Brussels. "We will not renegotiate," a UNHCR spokeswoman told reporters in Brussels.

European Parliament member Alan Smith, a Scottish national and one of the opponents of Britain's withdrawal from the EU, raised the case in an effort to clarify article 50 of the EU treaty before the court.

"The ruling sends a clear message to MPs in Britain before the vote, that there is a way out of this mess, a light at the end of the tunnel for the economy and jobs and Britain's place on the world stage, it is now back to the United Kingdom," a member said.

He added: "If Britain decides to change its position on exit from the European Union would be to abandon Article 50 option, and on the European side make every effort to welcome the return of Britain with open arms».

- The European Court allows to abandon the "letter of intent" .. The Commission refuses.