The Abu Dhabi Court of Appeal has begun hearing a case of a Gulf charge of assaulting an "Arab nationality" employee while he was on duty and decided to hold the case on March 27.
The details of the case refer to the accused taking his three-year-old daughter to a hospital for emergency treatment. Upon entering the reception, the nurse tried to withdraw blood from the girl. However, his attempts were unsuccessful and the child's condition worsened. The appellant, "and signed an argument between them, and was directed to the appellant by the dress and assault on an employee while performing his work.
The first instance court sentenced the defendant to the first charge of the offense of assaulting an employee for one year in prison and a fine of 10,000 dirhams. He ordered the suspension of the sentence of three years from the date of the end of the sentence with the imposition of judicial fees and the acquittal of the accused Of the second charge of the crime of insulting a public official for lack of evidence.
The defense of the accused, the lawyer, Ali Hassan al-Hammadi, presented the defense memorandum to the appealed judgment, in which he was aware of his violation of the law and his lack of reason and corruption in the reasoning and not to be fully covered by the case file, especially that the charge of infringement punished by the accused appellant had no evidence in the papers and that the report on which he relied The case began with a statement of alleged physical assault, despite the absence of wounds or scratches.
Al-Hammadi pointed out in his memo that the victim is known to commit malicious and fabricate the accusation, in order to profit and make money in exchange for bargaining to waive his complaint and blackmail the accused, like any other victim of the victim according to the fixed papers, the investigation report on the incident in question, Where the victim has agreed to request money from his victims in other cases. He also asked the case for a financial amount in return for his waiver. He paid for the lack of reason and corruption in the reasoning in order to seek the cancellation of the appeal. Ni it.
The investigation report on the investigation and investigation into the case of the restricted letter indicated that the case was transferred to the hospital in place of the incident and in coordination with the relevant official was directed to the security cameras room, the security official reported that there were no cameras at the scene of the incident, so it was not possible to determine the health of the incident or not, Further investigation of the incident We received reliable information from one of our secret sources that the author of the communication is being paid for the waiver of the communication, noting that he has already received a large sum of money in one of the communications after being referred to the judiciary, G replaces the incident that the complainant had asked him the amount of AED 150 thousand counterpart to waive the communication.
The defense memorandum submitted to the Court indicated that the author replied yes to the prosecution's inquiries when asked about his statement in the investigation report that he was opening a communication to the persons to charge money for the waiver and that he had received a large sum of money in a previous communication. 150 thousand dirhams for the waiver, pointing out that this speech is not true, but requested 100 thousand dirhams in exchange for his waiver.
The witness did not understand the Arabic language according to his testimony in the prosecution, pointing out that the witness works in the reception, according to him, he was in reception and the accused went to the office of the official in addition to all questions Who replied that he did not know that he did not understand the Arabic language even in the incident of assault and insult replied that he does not know and therefore the papers are limited to the statements of the victim, which proved the purpose of those statements and allegations.