The Federal Supreme Court rejected an appeal against mental abuse in a sentence that sentenced him to six months in prison, confirming evidence of the incident.
In detail, the Public Prosecution referred an accused to a criminal trial on charges of using mental stimuli and violating the rules and procedures of periodic examination, demanding that he be punished.
The first instance court sentenced the accused to one year's imprisonment for the first charge and acquitted him of the second charge. The Court of Appeal ruled that the sentence was amended and that he was only six months in prison for the charge imposed on him and charged by the charges.
The defense of the accused said that the court did not respond to the aspects of its defense, especially regarding the unreasonableness of the incident attributed to him, "the abuse of the mental agent", as a attachment to a training course during the period in which he was accused of "abuse" To examine, and that the report of the result of the report is not specific to him, which is a defect in the rule of shortcomings and violation of the right of defense, which must be revoked.
The Federal Supreme Court rejected this appeal, asserting that the Court of Appeal must take the reasons for the preliminary judgment and consider its reasons complementary to its reasons when it is satisfied and assured the grounds on which it was based. It is therefore satisfied to face the appeal against the defenses raised by the accused. Those defenses and to respond only to the judgment.
The court found that the preliminary ruling, which is based on the reasons for the appeal, presented the case and its evidence and concluded that the defendant was convicted of the charge of "mental abuse," according to the sample examination report. Is satisfied with the periodic examination report, the sample examination report, and that the defense of the accused does not arise to respond to these evidence and that the court is reassured.