In fact, all this has already happened. And more than once in history. And the commissars in the dusty helmets that lead our girls to the study. And Komsomol workers, self-confident, because there is an older brother - the party. And the current masters of life are also unlikely to deny themselves the pleasure of taking advantage of the enthusiastic admiration of young nymphs with wide eyes. All this has always been. But only now has it changed. 

Now for some reason, it has become important for the nymphs who have grown up to bring their awkward first sexual experience to public discussion. In no case can I blame them for this. But what I don’t like about this whole story is that, after hindsight, those men who were participants in this first sexual experience are presented with serious legal claims. “Only after years, my friends explained to me what it was: I was raped.” So now events are interpreted. And the victims of girlfriends suddenly lose everything in one day: work, name, prospects. I am a dork, jouir and bonvivan - I cannot welcome these changes.

However, there are other aspects.

Actually, the story is this: for several days, girls on Twitter talk about their sexual failures with people from the so-called liberal journalistic party. Among those exiled are leaders and employees of opposition publications, regular participants in all sorts of protests in defense of innocently convicted journalists and, most importantly, moral authorities. Which more than once or twice taught their audience and the very girls what a real knight of a white cloak and sharp feather should be.

And, as it has already happened more than once in the history of all kinds of MeToo, a real knight, editor of the opposition media, today sits on the YouTube channel and condemns one deputy there for calling the girl a bunny, and tomorrow the same knight becomes a member of a gang rape (well, at least that's what all these adherents of the so-called new ethics write - there is no evidence in the case of the deputy or the editor).

This is one of those “other aspects”. That is, a complete lack of evidence and an unconditional faith in a conditional victim. Because there is no secret in such a surprising transformation of a knight into a rapist. Even Venedikt Vasilievich Erofeev in his immortal poem “Moscow-Petushki” wrote this: “I generally notice: if a person is nasty in the mornings, and in the evening he is full of intentions, dreams, and efforts, he is very bad, this person. It’s bad in the morning and good in the evening - a sure sign of a bad person. But if it is the other way around - if in the mornings a person is awake and full of hopes, and by the evening exhaustion overcomes him - this is certainly a man of rubbish, laziness and mediocrity. Had me this man. I don’t know about you, but I’m disgusting. Of course, there are those who are equally fond of in the morning, in the evening, and in the sunrise, and the sunset, too, they are happy - it’s just bastards, it’s disgusting to talk about them. Well, and if it’s equally bad for anyone - both in the morning and in the evening - then I don’t know what to say, it’s a complete bastard and ******* ”.

These words are written just about those who are turning. But Erofeev has nothing about the conditional victim. Just because fifty years ago, when his immortal poem was written, there were no conditional victims. All the victims were concrete, provided with a set of evidence.

Now, the proof that the girl was doing badly is her confession that she goes to a therapist and sits on pills. No other evidence is needed. You don’t even need proof that she really goes to a therapist and sits on pills. Although this is most likely true. Because all this MeToo and all this “new ethics” (that is, the rejection of the continuation of human life through sexual reproduction) come from pills and psychotherapists. Because before there was no such garbage. And people lived, loved and were happy. By the way, in this whole rather large-scale body of confessions on Twitter there are many different new words: “abusive relations”, “harassment”, “sexual integrity” - a lot of things. Only the words "love" are not there anywhere. This is sad.

However, you should not think that I justify serial maniacs. And among the heroes of recent days, there are those about the unsuccessful experience with which not one, not two, or even three girls spoke. Apparently, these heroes are the ones that the girls of my youth talked about: it's easier to give than explain why not. But that was the old ethics - now everything is different. And the appearance of such serial maniacs now (and precisely among moral authorities) is precisely due to the fact that they first show their moral authority, and then immediately take off their pants. But can there be something bad in the pants of moral authority? Oh, how many similar examples we have seen! And one satirist writer there. And one editor-in-chief of the radio station ... However, he did not seem to be making moral authority out of himself. Now these young, successful heroes of a beautiful future in Russia. Clientele providers to psychotherapists and providers of demand for antidepressant pharmacies. And then I would say to the young beauty with her eyes wide open: if you see moral authority - run!

But where to run? 

It turns out, nowhere to run.

Because in the world of the “new ethics”, it seems, there are no men. 

And there are only barbershops, tight-fitting trousers, and all this is here: "I apologize if I ...".

And yes, I’m asking you not to consider all of the above as any manifesto.

The point of view of the author may not coincide with the position of the publisher