The report of the US Federal Treasury for March 2020 showed a paradoxical reduction in foreign investment in the US public debt, considered the most reliable financial instrument in the world. For a month, foreign investors got rid of US government bonds by more than $ 0.25 trillion (by the $ 256 billion that the Fed had to buy), reducing investments by 3.6% (from $ 7.1 trillion to $ 6.8 trillion).

Of course, this reduction in itself does not pose the slightest threat to US financial stability: the bulk of the public debt is controlled by American holders, and the scale of the issue is such that its insignificant increase against the general background will easily cover the exit from government bonds of even its largest holders. In recent crisis periods, the Fed bought more than 60% of the growth of the US public debt only directly, directly financing the budget deficit (excluding strange operations like spasmodic growth in investments in them by countries such as Belgium, which were interpreted by many as hidden buying up the federal debt).

But as a tendency, the reduction in foreign investment in US government bonds is of interest. In past crises, all speculative capitals of the world escaped to US government securities as the most reliable financial instrument, which led to a combined increase in foreign investment in them. Today, it seems that global speculators no longer see them as a safe haven.

The reduction in investments of many impeccably pro-American governments is not caused by political intent, but solely by the severity of the financial situation. In the end, the investments of the Russian monetary authorities, which comply with the IMF recommendations, are even more diligent than in the 1990s, with all their insignificance, also almost tripled (from more than $ 10 billion to $ 3.85 billion) for a good reason - to maintain the ruble .

The beginning of the collapse of the world into the Global Depression, disguised as coronabesia, hit many states, forcing them to sell off part of their most liquid reserves, that is, American government securities.

Losses were also suffered by speculative capital, which was also forced to use the most liquid reserves.

But these excuses only cover up the growing deep and largely irrational fear of the United States, the destabilization of which makes the dollar itself unpredictable, which is still the foundation of international finance. 

For the sake of overthrowing Trump, global liberals can consciously provoke a new aggravation of the global economic crisis.

How can this be, the world remembers in September 2008, when supporting Lehman Brothers was an immeasurably less expensive undertaking than destroying it, and could go on for a couple more years - just for the sake of stability. But before the election, this stability harmed global speculators: to plant their boyfriend in the White House, they needed a crisis that exposed the Republicans' incapacity. 

Something similar is possible on the eve of the current elections, if only because the issue price for global speculators is immeasurably higher than 12 years ago. Indeed, for many of them, the loss of power, but of freedom, does not shine (given the scale of theft in Ukraine uncovered by Giuliani, and American money was probably stolen there), and given the tradition of preventive elimination of potential witnesses, and life. 

On the other hand, American specialists and flocks of liberal political technologists brought up by them all over the world have brought the art of organizing “color revolutions” to standard procedures that are quite accessible even for people, according to Giuliani, “with an IQ of level 10”. And the absence in Washington of the American embassy as the center of the “color revolution” is fully compensated by the presence of offices of okolosorosov funds there. 

It is clear that even a deliberately doomed to failure (to distract Trump and intimidate his family) attempt at a “color revolution” will hit the United States (and its government securities) worse than an atomic bomb. 

But even without such dramatic circumstances, the mere seepage of emitted dollars into the real sector (inevitable due to the successful support of the latter by Trump) will accelerate the already high (if not distracted by official statistics) inflation in the United States - with obvious consequences for their government securities. 

Important and strategic changes. The world is breaking up into macroregions, and the United States, only in the 20th century having twice abandoned their obligations, may well abandon them for the third time - in respect of dollars and government securities belonging to representatives of “foreign” macroregions. 

In the upcoming post-financial world of cyber reality, this will not even greatly undermine their power, which is increasingly based on technological control, propaganda, military force and social engineering. In the very near future, the source of power will be direct control of the masses of people through social networks: the dollar will become as redundant as the financial capital hostile to Trump, and it will be possible to do the same.

Therefore, it is possible that the cooling of speculators for US government securities is not operational, but strategic in nature: they simply begin to look for a replacement for them.

The point of view of the author may not coincide with the position of the publisher.