A Saudi court has ordered that the death penalty limit be imposed on the husband and his murder, and that he will not accept pardon from the blood parents, after he was convicted of intentionally killing his wife and aggression and strangling her to death. The Qisas and Borders Department described the crime as killing the victim of an infallible blood, stressing the lack of acceptance of the husband's retreat from his admission of the killing, since the confession was issued before a judicial authority, supported by the connected evidence, and the ruling became final.
According to the findings of the Saudi newspaper "Okaz", the 32-year-old man killed his wife by suffocation and then transported her wrapped in a blanket with a "car bag" to the hospital, claiming that the death occurred as a result of electric shock, but forensic medicine confirmed the victim was beaten And suffocation, so that the perpetrator confessed that he had clashed with his wife in an abnormal condition because of his mental illness and drug addiction. He said in his confessions that he strangled her at night and did not mention how this happened, and the next day he found her dead body, and asked her to prepare him for breakfast!
The murderous husband in his confessions denied his knowledge because of the quarrel, and how the betrayed died due to his mental illnesses and his hallucinations resulting from drug use, and the husband went on to his confessions further and represented his crime in front of forensic evidence.
Later, a report issued by the Taif Mental Health Hospital shows that the killer suffers from persistent delusions, schizophrenia, depression and a deterioration in mental capabilities, while the Public Prosecution requested the husband be killed alone, and provided 11 evidence and presumption. Presenting the charges to the husband before the court, he replied: "I killed her by suffocation with the presence of my 4 children while they were sleeping. There was no hostility or disagreement between me and her ... I was a drug user at the time."
The court confirmed his statements while he was legally considered, and reviewed the medical reports issued in the accused's mental state, and stressed that the husband's drug use does not exempt him from punishment, as he is costly and guarantor of his actions. The court affirmed that the justification of the accused for his crime by going out of his mind is not acceptable, since he is the one whose mind was gone by his actions, especially since the incident was murdered, and the perpetrator is punished by killing with an end rather than a punishment, and he does not accept pardon, and he is prejudicial to the private right, and after deliberation, a judgment was issued unanimously to kill the husband One ..