For Pierre Dezeraud, columnist of & quot; Media Culture & quot; with Philippe Vandel, the great success of Mask Singer on TF1 should not hide the limits of this program abundantly promoted before its broadcast on Friday night. This big raout with hidden personalities does not equal "The Voice" in terms of intensity.
For Pierre Dezeraud, columnist of "Culture Media" with Philippe Vandel, the great success of Mask Singer on TF1 should not hide the limits of this program abundantly promoted before its broadcast on Friday night. This great raunch with masked personalities does not equal "The Voice" in terms of intensity. THE NOTICE
6.6 million viewers, 48% of housewives under 50 gathered in front of their TV, #MaskSinger in second place of the most discussed topics on Twitter in the world ... The numbers around the first issue of Mask Singer, Friday, on TF1, give the tournis, to the extent of the runaway aroused upstream of the broadcast of this program in which personalities sing while being disguised. The first personality unveiled Friday was Marie-Josée Perec, 400m Olympic champion in 1996. In Culture Media with Philippe Vandel , Monday, our columnist and journalist at Pure Media Pierre Dezeraud believes that despite being a " nice find, "the program from South Korea does not deserve unreserved enthusiasm.
"It's not the format of the century, it's still disguised stars singing on a set, it's not something totally unexpected, it's light, it's entertaining, it fulfills its role very well, but that's not the quintessence of the flow format that for me remains The Voice : it's a slap, a story that's told, there's no stakes, no history, no sum to win, it's pure entertainment.
I would have liked the viewers to vote. Two points are a little sad: the lack of direct, it's a little entertainment-tray, with a program a little cold. And I would have liked, if the show had been broadcast live, that viewers can vote through an application, for example. It would have strengthened the interaction. It's an 'implicative' program, people have wanted from home to participate in the survey and it is not clear why it is the public and the jury who vote.
It is not clear what the jury brings to the program. Moreover, I did not find the relevant jury at all. We do not really see what they bring to the program, except to say again and again that it's 'completely crazy'. Obviously, it's not easy to be on set and guess who is hiding under the costumes, but there they were seriously next to the plate. The panther says his mate is not a politician and Kev Adams says it's Carla Bruni-Sarkozy. They are broken arm investigators. They are not very important in the mechanics since their vote is drowned in the middle of that of the public present in the room. "
