Green activists generally tend to ignore the laws of nature and social life. They believe that their right faith in the God of Oxygen can overcome any laws of a decrepit pre-ecological civilization.

Therefore, it is not surprising that the teenage activist Greta Tunberg was very surprised and even upset when she had to deal with the harsh law of the worldwide network: “This is the Internet, baby. Here they can send to ... "

Sent Greta made a counter statement: “Like many others, I ask if I should continue to use Facebook or not. He allows words of hatred, lack of fact-checking and, of course, interference with democracy ... Constant lies and conspiracy theories about me lead to hatred, threats of murder and, ultimately, violence. This could easily be stopped if the Facebook administration so desired. I consider such irresponsibility a very disturbing sign. But I’m sure that change will come. ”

Generally speaking, after our fiery speech at the United Nations (“My message to you: we will monitor what you are doing. Everything that happens is wrong. You are turning to us, youth, for hope! How dare you do this?” You, it was you, who stole my dreams and my childhood with your empty speeches! ”), And an activist Greta might have expected that not everyone would accept her activities with complete favor with a speech delivered with a wry face. Polemic objections here directly beg.

In addition, the peculiarity of the electric Internet is that any polemic quickly takes on an ignorant and controversial form. US President Trump could share with his girlfriend, unfortunately, numerous examples of constant lies and conspiracy theories, in which the current villain of the White House is the main villain. And not only Trump. People who work on the scaffolds of the whole world have long been accustomed to the fact that on the Internet discussion of their activities is happening more and more on the principle of "by his horns and between him."

Moreover, in order to receive through the horns and in between, it is not even necessary to decide the fate of the world. In culinary, sports, women’s and girls’s forums, the same fateful passions boil, mostly clothed in a form that is inconvenient for printing. The promiscuity of cyber activists is very great.

Perhaps Greta Tunberg didn’t even imagine what dangers her young innocence could have on the electric Internet: “The complete ignorance of the customs and personalities of the cybernets found only among girls is noticeable in everything.” But where are the experienced adults who could warn her?

It is possible that theories about the good grandfather Soros, taming the Greta hunweibinka, are greatly exaggerated, or the good grandfather is already in such a state that he doesn’t understand much.

But the parents of the activists are in a very capable age, and to protect their brainchild from danger is their direct duty.

In any case, infantility rolls over. The young rebels of 1968 were no less decisive than Greta, calling the generation of their fathers reactions (reactionaries), as well as old farts. But they, at least, were not surprised when the reactions stroked them not by the coat, but against the coat, and instead of complaining and mumbling, they bravely entered into battle with the farts. Still, some signs of adult behavior were observed in them. What can not be said about the current hunweibins.

In any case, the pupil of the sorcerer Zuckerberg is not envied. He proclaimed his slogan Connecting people, assuming the broadest freedom and democracy, but it turned out that when it comes to him, his beloved, he is very touchy and almost angrily asks: “Where is the police looking?”

Which, however, corresponds to human nature:

We, comrades, need

Like Shchedriny

And such Gogol,

To not touch us.

And since Internet Gogols, on the contrary, are distinguished by their maliciousness and even maliciousness, all sorts of offended people immediately knock on the US Congress, and Zuckerberg is forced to go there as a job and humiliate himself with excuses. Connecting people is hard work.

The author’s point of view may not coincide with the position of the publisher.