Scholars of contemporary Islamic sects and their views on Ibadi thought

News from the island

• Concerns about the lives of Saudi detainees, torture and harassment of women activists
• A rare public disagreement between Trump and the head of the Supreme Court
• Watch .. The moment of an explosion during a celebration of the Prophet's birth in Kabul
• Desert tourism .. Another face of settlement in the West
• Le Figaro: Riyadh followed Khashoggi with an Israeli spy

When considering the views of contemporary scholars in Ibadi and their view of them, we find that they are more tolerant than the scholars of the old teams, in this article we address the views of three of them, and we will follow them in other articles, God willing.

Sheikh Mohammed Abu Zahra and Ibadi:

In his book "The Islamic Schools of Thought", Professor Muhammad Abu Zahra says: "The Ibadis are the followers of Abdullah Ibn Abad, who are the most moderate Kharijis and the closest to the Islamic Group thinking, so they are far from exaggeration and stupidity and therefore they remained, and they have good jurisprudence and they are excellent scholars, And some of the other in Zanzibar, and have the views of jurisprudence The Egyptian laws have been quoted in the inheritance of some of their views and in the inheritance of Loyal lovers, the Egyptian law for all the heirs until the response to one of the spouses, although all four doctrines make it after the League of Relativity, The answer to the predecessors and the majority is preceded Arb ", otherwise, the total views of the Ibadhi are:

- The violators of the Muslims are not polytheists or believers and call them infidels, and they say that they are infidels of blessing not infidels in belief, because they did not disbelieve in God, but they were short in the side of God Almighty.

The blood of those who violate them is haraam, and their house is Dar al-Tawhid and Islam, except for the camp of the Sultan, but they do not declare this. They are pleased with themselves that the house of the violators and their blood is haraam.

- It is not permissible to spoil the spoils of Muslims who fight only horses and weapons and all that is in it in wars, and they return gold and silver.

- The testimony of the violators and their inheritance and inheritance.

- In all this, it turns out their moderation and fairness to their violation.

The scholar Sheikh Abu Zahra says: The difference between them is doctrinal doctrines: These political groups, including those that do not have a doctrine of jurisprudential stand-alone, including those who do not have a doctrine of jurisprudence, and follow the doctrine of another sect close to him in belief, and the difference that have doctrines of jurisprudence is considered three: Ibadi, followers of Abdullah ibn Abad, and they have a jurisprudence blogger, and they have great efforts in the liberation of their doctrine.

Sheikh Ali Yahya Muammar commented on the words of Abu Zahra. He said: Although he showed a lot of moderation, he used tenderness and kindness, and recorded new peaceful opinions on the subject of the difference and the Ibadis in particular. However, he did not escape from being influenced by previous statements that lack investigation and scrutiny of expression And the clarification of the meanings to reveal the facts as a revelation is not likely to inspire or thumb.

He said: Although Professor Aba Zahra admits that the Abadis are moderate and fair to their opponents and that they have a well-written conscience, and that their scientists efforts to liberalize their doctrine, all this did not accompany the Ibadi at Abu Zahra to remove them from the Kharijis, or even from this new label "parties Religious, "and although such qualities or less of the Zaidi and Jafarism of the Shiites, recognized by Professor Abu Zahra and wrote about their jurisprudence and doctrines, but his position on Ibadi was - as I see - the position of the man who knows the right issue of issues revolve around him and describe him from afar , And can not be declared explicitly, because certain deposits prevent it He said: We do not doubt that Professor Abba Zahra knows from the fact of Ibadi what the Ibadi know themselves about their opinions and articles and even freed from the ruins of the past for what they mentioned in the Kharijites and religious parties. Sheikh Ali Yahya Muammar summarized what Sheikh Abu Zahra wrote in the following points:

- Dependence on the sources of others When writing about Ibadhi and their articles, he could rely on Ibadhi books themselves.

- Use the same twisted twisted expressions used by the books of Islamic articles for centuries.

- Tvavlh from the intrigues of politics, so that the focus on two camps was the word "violators" is the focus of talk.

- The drift behind the views of the orientalists or those who took them in dividing the nation into two major sections: doctrines of jurisprudence and religious parties.

- his neglect to write about the doctrine of Ibadi and Faqah has been written on both doctrines of jurisprudence and what he calls religious parties.

- Satisfaction with the owners of previous articles, and to draw their line, he took Professor Abu Zahra Ibadi in the Kharij teams.

The effect of the education of the Ibadi school in the style of Sheikh Ali Yahya Al-Muammar, and he speaks of the sign Abu Zahra in saying: I am pleased at the end of this chapter to apologize to our master Abu Zahra for any words that may feel bad with him, Respect and appreciation what he and his ilk of our scholars deserve from the greatness of our distinguished scholars who have served Islam in this age, a service that is not forgotten by generations. And if I write it in the previous points, it is the position of the learner bridges frank with the world, abundant material and well-informed, as well as Halim, which is likely to riot learners with a receptive chest.

Mustafa bin Saleh Bajo:

The opinion of Dr. Mustafa bin Saleh Bajo Ibadi in saying: "As for the relationship of Ibadhi Khwarij, it is a case of the old and the most modern, although the articles of articles agreed to incite the Ibadi in the group of Kharij, Ibadi sources deny this link, and renounced the evils that The most recent Kharijites in Islam. " He added: ".. Ibadhi is considered the exit that was mentioned in the Prophet's Hadiths religious departure in the sense of Mahroq religion to change its provisions and encroachment on the sanctity of what he did Alzarqat and Ndjat and other extremists, but out of the political concept is to get out of the obedience of the Sultan, the Ibadhi have preferred isolation from the Imam After Muawiya was standing in a legitimate right, and a valid oath. "

And as a result of the fact that Mu'awiya himself, the Imam of Imam Ali, the authority of an imam, the Muslims pledged allegiance to him and fought Muawiyah in two rows, and he followed That blind fascination brought the choice of Companions Messenger of God. But that the talk of these issues today and in the spirit of condemnation and trial, a revival of a gesture that we have not seen and did not swallow, and cleanse tongues about the safest religion and all of the world, but unfortunately that the events of great strife, which began to spark with the death of Caliph Uthman bin Affan, Muslims are still breathing smoke rising to today, These dense fumes have prevented them from seeing each other on the real pure face.

Amer Al-Najjar:

"The Ibadi is one of the closest groups to the Islamic Group to moderate their doctrine and tolerance to their opponents, but they are angry at what they consider a group of Kharijites and the reason for the impeachment of Ibadi in Khawarij political Umayyad state in the heresy on the Ibadi to alienate people from the Ibadi sect who They found them hard in their positions against the Umayyad state, and many fanatics and the public also accepted this affinity and proved it in their books - without examining or searching for the truth. "

Perhaps the most prominent reason for accusing the Ibadis that they are Kharij denied arbitration and the fact that some writers of Islamic articles and teams were in their rule on the Ibadhi cruel non-objective, and appear that the owners of the articles, looked at all attributed to the Kharij - wrong or false - Vsboh to Ibadi, He denies the consensus and denies stoning and denies the torment of the grave.

The Ibadites do not deny the consensus, but see it as the third of the fundamentals of the legislation and do not deny stoning. Rather, they say that it is proven in the Sunnah and the practical, and not in the Koran, and they confirm the torment of the grave and the question of the two kings.

I strongly tend to the opinion of Dr. Awad Khalifat, in which he asserts that the Ibadites are not Kharijites, because the Ibadites were denied the killing of the Almohads and the desecration of their blood. They forbade the people to review and test them, as did the Kharijites such as the Azhar and the Najdiyya. Are the result of one of two things ignorance or intolerance. The Ibadis are absolved of the acts of the Kharijites, so how are they attributed to them and they were among the most severe people on them.

References:

1- Ali Mohammed Al-Salabi, Ibadi, an Islamic school away from the Kharijis, 2018/2019.

2 - Ali Yahya Muammar, Ibadi between the Islamic groups, Damari library for publication, Amman, third edition 2014, PO Box 97-99, (108-109).

3 - Mohammed Ahmed bin Zahra, the history of Islamic schools, Arab Thought House, p. 97, p. 127.

4 - Mustafa Saleh Yago, Abu Yacoub Al-Rjalani fundamentalist, 2 2007.

5 - Amer al-Najjar, Ibadi and its relevance to the Khwarij, p. P. (85-86).