How can the education system make us more stupid?

Who among us has missed many opportunities in his life or at least one precious opportunity? And it is only because he chose not to try and a corner of the unsatisfactory situation. Is it possible for you to think and move this way? To say that there is nothing wrong with the position where you should have said that I will change this situation for the better? Or perhaps it is just a coincidence that does not require all these questions?

The education system based on the principle of punctuation suggests that the learner who has the most possession of a higher percentage of the points is superior, while the less punctuation, will receive the teacher's observation, which weakens him or the level below the required. And the label will contribute to the improvement of the performance of the study and not a total observation or real evaluation. The fact that the learner constantly receives such observations will not make him make an effort to improve his performance because the deficit will be his friend at the time.

That's exactly what Martin Selkman's experience of 1975 showed when he accidentally punched electric shocks and prevented them from escaping. After desperate attempts to avoid the pitfalls, the dogs chose to restrain the pain and get used to it even after it was unfastened and allowed to escape.

This experience enabled Slekman to come out with the phenomenon of "learning disability" or Learned helplessness and drop it on the psychology of man and how to interact with the challenges. The theory of "Selkman" has been generalized in several fields, including the education system, and how the disability is learned and learned by the students in an environment that is better taught by the opposite. In a unique and applied experiment, the professor of psychology, Karis Nixon, experimented with an application in a department. The chapter was divided into two classes of uneducated learners. The first class was divided into three accessible words with scattered characters. The second category chose words impossible to solve. I asked them to raise their hands when they found the first word, then the second, and the third.

The surprise was when Nixon asked second-class learners about how they felt about the test after they failed to solve the three words. The answers were: "I lost confidence in myself", "I felt stupid", "I was confused", "I was frustrated". Then the professor of psychology revealed the fact of classification and another fact that the third word is similar to everyone. However, the second class of students failed to solve them, unlike the rest. This experience is an explanation of the impact of the "learning disability" theory in schools and it may be time to rethink the observations we make to the learner and to question how effective it is.

I still remember the professor of Arabic who has written his red pen on the duty of construction by noting to me that my construction is substandard and not for any reason except because I did not like the subject of construction. The philosophy professor assured me that I am not a philosopher to allow myself to ask questions and think about the philosophical saying! I think here after years of the above in the number of students who believed the principle of punctuation of the teacher for their performance and deluded themselves in their inability to excel by the repetition of the abhorrent. Learning disability in the educational system is the most destructive form of love of learning and close the doors of initiative and creativity in the category is in dire need to demonstrate their capabilities and competencies. To repeat the negative remarks with the absence of constant encouragement of the young dimensions beyond the classes of study to living life. The learner does not need to test his performance as much as he needs to deal with the principle of punctuation intelligently.

The most dangerous of all the above is that the constant sense of frustration may lead to depression and to a psychological state that sees the change as a certain impossibility and positive and they do not exist. As a teacher, after reading this article, you can produce a complete line of change makers and believe in the possibility of coming up with solutions to all the societal problems. You can also speak negatively, with no encouragement at all, to see the results of tests and society as a whole with the same problems and pitfalls.