The Chinese company of the failed tests points to Health for not knowing well how they work

The Chinese company of failed coronavirus tests defends its products and points out that the Ministry of Health has not fully understood how they were applied. In a statement, Shenzen Bioeasy Biotechnology, assures that after the controversy aroused " we realize that our company has not communicated with due reiteration to the client the details of the procedure in the initial phase of the verification . "

This company confirms that it continues to work, however, with the Ministry of Health and that "the Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (SEIMC) is revalidating the tests following the guidelines provided by our company ". He hopes that there will be an official report on the result in a short time.

Meanwhile, "the Ministry of Health decided to replace the tests and continues to operate in cooperation with Bioeasy and required us to continue to supply relevant medical material on time to ensure supply."

The Chinese company does not deny the statement from the Embassy of its country in Spain that it still does not have a license in the competent medical material agency, but ensures that it "strictly complies with international law" and that on March 12 it obtained certification from the European Union to market its products against Covid-19.

He regrets in his statement that "due to the rapidity of the epidemic, European countries and other areas of the world have not provided themselves with a single, standard procedure for the use of rapid tests." And, if it is not applied well, "there may be deviations" and result in "false negatives" . Health Minister Salvador Illa confirmed that they were not working, but the person in charge of Emergencies, Fernando Simón, insisted on Friday that the company has been given another chance. "We will soon have these rapid tests that do appear to be of the required quality."

Consequently, he claims that he has instructed his staff to "record videos explaining the procedure" and "more detailed" explanatory documents. Also "clarify to customers that product verification should be strictly applied according to their instructions"

According to the criteria of The Trust Project