<Anchor>

The agreement between the Democratic Party of Korea and the Democratic Party, which amends the comprehensive real estate tax along with the budget bill, has resulted in more taxpayers who have more houses in the future.

There is an analysis that the tax burden will not increase more than when it was first promoted.

<Reporter>

It is the case that you have two type of 82-square-meter type of 112-square-meter acro river park in Seocho-gu, Seocho-gu and Jamsil 5 complex of Songpa-gu.

This year's combined total of property tax and property tax totaled 22.7 million won, up by 32.6 million won, about 17% from last year.

As in the previous year, we assume that the official land price will rise to around 10% as of this year, and the strengthened annual tax rate and fair market value ratio will be applied.

If the tax burden ceiling is 300%, the holding tax will increase by about 106%, or 24.15 million won.

However, as the upper limit of the tax burden is reduced to 200%, the holding tax will increase by 100% to more than RMB27.2 million.

It is about 145 million won difference.

[Woo, Byoung-taek / Head of Real Estate Investment Advisory Center, Shinhan Bank: I think the effect of the two houses will be relatively more relaxed mainly in areas including Seoul and Gangnam. On the average, it seems that you can see the effect of reducing 150,000 won by 500,000 won.]

According to the Ministry of Strategy and Finance, there are not many people whose tax burden is greatly reduced among the two residents, and the increase in the total income tax will not change much from the originally estimated 420 billion won level.

In the real estate industry, the housing price is already stabilizing downward, and some adjustments of the ceiling on the tax burden do not seem to have a big impact on the real estate market.

If you have more than 3 houses, there will be no change in the existing one.

Participating coalition members said that it is unfortunate that the upper limit of the tax burden is lowered, but that this agreement should be the first step to strengthening the holding tax for the reduction of asset inequality.

(Image coverage: Hwang In-seok, image editing: Jung, Yonghwa)